Publications

List of Publications

Business Informatics Group, TU Wien

Reset Filters

Matching Metamodels with Semantic Systems - An Experience Report

Gerti KappelHorst KarglGerhard KramlerAndrea SchauerhuberMartina SeidlMichael StrommerManuel Wimmer

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51778; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: Ontology and schema matching are well established techniques, which have been applied in various integration scenarios, e.g., web service composition and database integration. Consequently, matching tools enabling automatic matching of various kinds of schemas with various matching techniques are available. In the field of model-driven engineering, in contrast to schema and ontology integration, the in- tegration of modeling languages relies on manual tasks such as writing model trans- formation code, which is tedious and error-prone. Therefore, we propose the applica- tion of ontology and schema matching techniques for automatically exploring seman- tic correspondences between metamodels, which are currently the modeling language definitions of choice. The main focus of this paper is on reporting preliminary results and lessons learned by evaluating currently available ontology matching tools for their metamodel matching potential.

Kappel, G., Kargl, H., Kramler, G., Schauerhuber, A., Seidl, M., Strommer, M., & Wimmer, M. (2007). Matching Metamodels with Semantic Systems - An Experience Report. In Datenbanksysteme in Business, Technologie und Web (BTW 2007), Workshop Proceedings (pp. 38–52). Verlag Mainz. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51778

A State Machine executing UMM Business Transactions

Christian HuemerMarco Zapletal

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51785; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: UN/CEFACT's modeling methodology (UMM) is a UML profile for modeling global B2B choreographies. The current UMM version comprises three main views for describing a computation independent model from a neutral perspective. Currently, the UMM version is missing a platform independent model showing how each partner has to realize the message exchanges to support the agreed choreography. In this paper we derive such a platform independent model from a UMM business transaction - a key artifact of the computation independent model. The resulting model is based on a state machine describing the local view of a participating business partner. This state machine unambiguously defines how a business partner has to react on incoming messages and on message expected but not received.

Huemer, C., & Zapletal, M. (2007). A State Machine executing UMM Business Transactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 Inaugural IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2007) (p. 6). IEEE Computer Society. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51785

A UML Profile for Core Components and their Transformation to XSD

Christian HuemerPhilipp Liegl

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51800; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: In business-to-business e-commerce, traditional electronic data interchange (EDI) approaches such as UN/EDIFACT have been superseded by approaches like web services and ebXML. Nevertheless, a precise and common semantic definition of business documents exchanged is needed. In order to become independent from a transfer syntax, we prefer defining the documents as platform independent models. An approach that follows this idea is the UN/CEFACT's core component standard. Core components are reusable semantic building blocks which can be combined in various ways to create shared libraries of interoperable business documents. In order to use standard UML modeling tools we have developed a UML profile for the core components standard. Furthermore, we adapt the UN/CEFACT naming and design rules for the UML profile in order to derive XML schemas for business document exchanges. The overall approach is demonstrated by using a specific example from the field of eCommerce.

Huemer, C., & Liegl, P. (2007). A UML Profile for Core Components and their Transformation to XSD. In Proceeding of 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop (pp. 298–306). IEEE Computer Society. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51800

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL TRANSFORMATION ISSUES The top 7 adversaries encountered at defining model transformations

Marion MurzekGerhard Kramler

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51813; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: Not least due to the widespread use of meta modeling concepts, model transformation techniques have reached a certain level of maturity (Czarnecki and Helsen, 2006). Nevertheless, defining transformations in some application areas in our case business process modeling is still a challenge because current transformation languages provide general solutions but do not support issues specific to a distinct area. We aim at providing generic solutions for model transformation problems distinct to the area of horizontal business process model transformations. As a first step in this endeavor, this work reports on the most pressing problems encountered at defining business process model transformations.

Murzek, M., & Kramler, G. (2007). BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL TRANSFORMATION ISSUES The top 7 adversaries encountered at defining model transformations. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on enterprise information systems (pp. 144–151). ISAS. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51813

The Model Morphing Approach - Horizontal Transformations between Business Process Models

Marion MurzekGerhard Kramler

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51865; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: Due to company mergers, acquisition and business to business interoperability, there is a need for model transformations in the area of business process modeling to facilitate scenarios like model translation, integration and synchronization. Thus this paper concentrates on transformations of models between different business process modeling languages. As current transformation languages provide general solutions and do not support the special properties of business process models, it is still a challenge defining such transformations. To tackle this problem we introduce the model morphing approach. Our main idea is to create an integrated metamodel containing all concepts of the languages of a given domain. Based on this integration the model transformation can be defined in terms of morphing steps. Our approach is demonstrated by model transformation in the area of business process modeling but is generally suitable for domains in which a variety of languages is used that express similar concepts.

Murzek, M., & Kramler, G. (2007). The Model Morphing Approach - Horizontal Transformations between Business Process Models. In J. Nummenmaa & E. Söderström (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Perspecitves in Business Information Research - BIR 2007 (pp. 88–103). Department of Computer Sciences, University of Tampere. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51865

MDWEnet: A Practical Approach to Achieving Interoperability of Model-Driven Web Engineering Methods

Antonio VallecilloNora KochCristina CacheroSara ComaiPiero FraternaliIrene GarrigósJaime GomézGerti KappelAlexander KnappMaristella MateraSantiago MeliáNathalie MorenoBirgit PröllThomas ReiterWerner RetschitzeggerJosé E. RiveraAndrea SchauerhuberWieland SchwingerManuel WimmerGefei Zhang

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51881; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: Current model-driven Web Engineering approaches (such as OO-H, UWE or WebML) provide a set of methods and supporting tools for a systematic design and development of Web applications. Each method addresses different concerns using separate models (content, navigation, presentation, business logic, etc.), and provide model compilers that produce most of the logic and Web pages of the application from these models. However, these proposals also have some limitations, especially for exchanging models or representing further modeling concerns, such as architectural styles, technology independence, or distribution. A possible solution to these issues is provided by making model-driven Web Engineering proposals interoperate, being able to complement each other, and to exchange models between the different tools. MDWEnet is a recent initiative started by a small group of researchers working on model-driven Web Engineering (MDWE). Its goal is to improve current practices and tools for the model-driven development of Web applications for better interoperability. The proposal is based on the strengths of current model-driven Web Engineering methods, and the existing experience and knowledge in the field. This paper presents the background, motivation, scope, and objectives of MDWEnet. Furthermore, it reports on the MDWEnet results and achievements so far, and its future plan of actions.

Vallecillo, A., Koch, N., Cachero, C., Comai, S., Fraternali, P., Garrigós, I., Goméz, J., Kappel, G., Knapp, A., Matera, M., Meliá, S., Moreno, N., Pröll, B., Reiter, T., Retschitzegger, W., Rivera, J. E., Schauerhuber, A., Schwinger, W., Wimmer, M., & Zhang, G. (2007). MDWEnet: A Practical Approach to Achieving Interoperability of Model-Driven Web Engineering Methods. In 7th International Conference on Web Engineering, Workshop Proceedings (pp. 246–254). Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione, Politecnico di Milano, Italy. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51881

A Semi-automatic Approach for Bridging DSLs with UML

Manuel WimmerAndrea SchauerhuberMichael StrommerWieland SchwingerGerti Kappel

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51887; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings;

Keywords:
Astract: The definition of modeling languages is a key-prerequisite for model-driven engineering (MDE). In this respect, domain-specific languages (DSL) defined in terms of metamodels and UML profiles are often considered as two alternatives. For interoperability reasons, however, the need arises to bridge modeling languages originally defined as DSLs to UML profiles by defining (1) a specific UML profile to represent the domain-specific modeling concepts in UML and (2) model transformations for transforming DSL models to UML models and vice versa. A manual definition of a UML profile typically is a tedious and errorprone task, but contains a high potential for automation. The contribution of this paper is to integrate the so far competing worlds of DSLs and UML. We report on our semi-automatic approach based on the manual mapping of domain-specific metamodels and UML using a dedicated bridging language as well as the automatic generation of UML profiles and model transformations. We present our ideas within a case study for bridging ComputerAssociate´s DSL of the AllFusion Gen CASE tool with IBM´s Rational Software Modeler for UML.

Wimmer, M., Schauerhuber, A., Strommer, M., Schwinger, W., & Kappel, G. (2007). A Semi-automatic Approach for Bridging DSLs with UML. In J. Sprinkle, J.-P. Tolvanen, J. Gray, & M. Rossi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM´07) (pp. 97–104). Computer Science and Information System Reports, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51887

Modeling Business Entity State Centric Choreographies

Christian HuemerPhilipp LieglRainer SchusterMarco Zapletal

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51996; DOI: 10.1109/cec-eee.2007.70; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: In a B2B environment business partners interact with each other by exchanging electronic business documents. The agreements and commitments between the partner require a certain order in the flow of business documents. This flow - commonly known as choreography - often depends on the actual content of a business document. E.g. the next step depends on whether a price was stated in a quote document or not in the step before. These characteristics usually affect the states of a business entity - whether a quote is in state provided or in state refused. The states of a business entity usually define the next steps in the choreography of a collaborative business process. Thus, it is important that the actual business document content and resulting business entity states are unambiguously defined in a global choreography. In this paper we show how the modeling of business entity state centric choreographies may be incorporated into UN/CEFACT´s modeling methodology (UMM) - one of the best known approaches to model global choreographies.

Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R., & Zapletal, M. (2007). Modeling Business Entity State Centric Choreographies. In The 9th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and The 4th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services (CEC-EEE 2007). 9th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC 2007) / 4th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services (EEE 2007), Tokyo, Japan, EU. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/cec-eee.2007.70

Deriving executable BPEL from UMM Business Transactions

Birgit HofreiterChristian HuemerPhilipp LieglRainer SchusterMarco Zapletal

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51997; DOI: 10.1109/scc.2007.49; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM) is a UML profile for modeling global B2B choreographies. The basic building blocks of UMM are business transactions, which describe the exchange of a business document and an optional response. In addition to these business document exchanges, UMM business transactions mandate business signals that acknowledge the correctness of business documents. It is expected that a business service interface (BSI) on each business partner's side reacts on incoming messages and on messages expected but not received. However the internal orchestration of the BSI is open to interpretations. In this paper we demonstrate an unambiguous mapping from global choreographies described by UMM transactions to a BPEL-based orchestration of the business service interface. It becomes obvious that rather simple looking UMM transactions lead to a more complex message exchange mechanism when implemented on top of Web Services.

Hofreiter, B., Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R., & Zapletal, M. (2007). Deriving executable BPEL from UMM Business Transactions. In IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007). 2007 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Non-EU. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/scc.2007.49

The Web Services-BusinessActivity-Initiator (WS-BA-I) Protocol: an Extension to the Web Services-BusinessActivity Specification

Hannes ErvenGeorg HickerChristian HuemerMarco Zapletal

View .bib

Handle: 20.500.12708/51999; DOI: 10.1109/icws.2007.174; Year: 2007; Issued On: 2007-01-01; Type: Publication; Subtype: Inproceedings; Peer Reviewed:

Keywords:
Astract: The Web Services Transaction protocol family includes the WS-AtomicTransaction and the WSBusinessActivity specifications in order to carry out distributed transactions in a Web Services (WS) environment. The WS-AtomicTransaction specification defines all necessary interfaces to carry out transactional work. In contrary, the WS-BusinessActivity specification for long-running transactions intentionally left the interface between initiator and coordinator undefined. This allows vendors to integrate WS-BusinessActivity coordinators into their business process engines. However, it requires proprietary protocols between initiator and coordinator. We propose an extension protocol to the WS-BusinessActivity specification that explicitly defines this interface between initiator and coordinator. This extension allows coordinators and initiators from different vendors to interoperate transparently. Accordingly, participants no longer need to trust an initiator-selected and likely initiator-run coordination service, but may use commonly trusted, third-party coordination services.

Erven, H., Hicker, G., Huemer, C., & Zapletal, M. (2007). The Web Services-BusinessActivity-Initiator (WS-BA-I) Protocol: an Extension to the Web Services-BusinessActivity Specification. In IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007). 2007 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Non-EU. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/icws.2007.174